Skip to main content

Anchoring Effect in Investing? Meaning, Examples and Impact

6 min read•Updated on 22nd Sept, 2026•by Team Angel One
The anchoring effect can influence investment decisions by leading investors to rely too heavily on past prices, targets, or other familiar numbers.
Share

The anchoring effect is a cognitive bias in which investors rely too heavily on an initial piece of information, a familiar price point, such as a purchase price or a 52-week high, when making financial decisions.

This psychological trap causes traders to hold losing positions simply to break even or sell winning stocks too early based on arbitrary milestones.

This article explains what the anchoring effect in investing is and its impact.

Key Takeaways

  • Anchoring is a behavioural bias in which investors place too much weight on an initial piece of information.
  • A stock's purchase price, previous high, IPO price, or analyst target can serve as an anchor.
  • Investors may hold a losing stock because they are waiting for it to return to their purchase price.
  • A stock trading below its previous high is not necessarily undervalued.
  • Looking at current fundamentals and valuations can help reduce the impact of anchoring.

What is the Anchoring Effect?

The anchoring effect occurs when a person relies heavily on an initial piece of information while making a decision. Once this information becomes a reference point, later information may not change the person's view as much as it should.

In investing, the anchor is often a number. It could be the price at which you bought a stock, its previous high, its IPO price, or an expected target price.

For example, suppose you bought a stock at ₹800. It falls to ₹600 after the company reports weaker-than-expected earnings. You may think, “I will sell when it gets back to ₹800.”

The question is whether ₹800 still makes sense.

If the company's earnings, growth prospects, or business outlook have changed, there may be little reason to believe the stock will return to ₹800. Yet, because ₹800 is the price you remember, it can continue to influence your decision.

That is the anchoring effect.

Psychologists Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman identified this pattern in 1974.

When people estimate an unknown value, they often start with the number already in front of them.

Then, they adjust their estimate away from that number, but usually don’t adjust enough.

The initial number becomes a reference point, even when it has little or no real relevance.

Knowing about anchoring doesn’t automatically eliminate it because the initial number can quietly shape how subsequent information is interpreted.

Examples of the Anchoring Effect in Investing

Anchoring can appear in several common investment decisions.

Anchoring to Your Purchase Price

You buy a stock at ₹400, and it falls to ₹280. You decide to hold it until it returns to ₹400.

  • Anchor: ₹400, your purchase price
  • Risk: Holding a stock only to recover your initial investment
  • Better question: Would you buy it at ₹280 today?

Anchoring to a Stock's Previous High

A stock falls from ₹1,500 to ₹1,000, making it look cheap at first glance.

  • Anchor: ₹1,500, the previous high
  • Risk: Assuming the stock must return to that level
  • Reality: A previous high does not determine today's fair value

Anchoring to the IPO Price

A stock lists at ₹600 and falls to ₹450. You assume it is undervalued because it is below its IPO price.

  • Anchor: ₹600, the IPO price
  • Risk: Treating the issue price as a measure of fair value
  • Reality: The company's prospects may have changed since the IPO

Anchoring to an Analyst's Target Price

An analyst sets a target of ₹1,200 when a stock trades at ₹900. Even after it reaches ₹1,100, you continue waiting for ₹1,200.

  • Anchor: ₹1,200, the original target
  • Risk: Treating an estimate as a fixed number
  • Reality: Targets can change with new information

Why is the Anchoring Effect Dangerous?

The main problem with anchoring is that it can make investors focus on the wrong question.

Instead of asking, “What is this investment worth today?”, they may ask, “How far is it from the price I remember?” This can affect both buying and selling decisions.

An investor may avoid buying a stock because it is trading above a price they had previously considered expensive. Another may hold on to a falling stock because they are waiting for it to return to their purchase price.

In both situations, the past is influencing a decision that should ideally be based on current information.

Anchoring can also make it harder to accept that an investment thesis has changed. Investors may continue defending a stock because they have already formed an opinion about it, even when the underlying facts no longer support that view.

How can Investors Avoid the Anchoring Effect?

You cannot completely eliminate behavioural biases from investing, but you can take steps to reduce their influence.

Reassess the Stock from Scratch

One simple question can help: “If I did not already own this stock, would I buy it today?”

This takes your purchase price out of the equation and makes you focus on the investment as it stands today.

Look at Current Fundamentals

Review the company's latest earnings, revenue growth, debt, cash flows, valuations, and future prospects. The objective is to understand whether the original reason for buying the stock still holds.

Do not Treat Previous Highs as Targets

A stock being 40% below its previous high does not mean it has 40% upside.

The previous high tells you what investors were willing to pay at a particular point in time. It does not establish what the stock should be worth today.

Review Your Investment Thesis

Before buying a stock, write down why you are investing in it. For example, your reasons could include expected earnings growth, improving margins, or expansion into a new market.

Later, review whether those reasons still hold. This can be more useful than simply checking whether the stock is above or below your purchase price.

Compare Other Opportunities

Ask yourself whether the investment is still the best use of your money.

Instead of thinking, “I need this stock to return to ₹500,” consider whether you would choose the same stock over other available investments at its current price.

This shifts the focus from recovering a past loss to making a better decision today.

How to Identify Anchoring in Your Investment Decisions

Anchoring is not always obvious because the reference point can feel completely logical.

Watch out for statements such as:

  • “I bought it at ₹500, so I don't want to sell below that.”
  • “It was trading at ₹1,000 last year.”
  • “The IPO price was ₹600.”
  • “The analyst had a target of ₹1,200.”
  • “I will buy it when it comes back to ₹800.”

None of these statements is necessarily wrong. The issue is whether the number is used as part of a broader analysis or drives the entire decision.

If you removed that number from the conversation, would your investment decision remain the same? If the answer is no, it may be worth taking another look at your reasoning.

Conclusion

The anchoring effect can quietly influence the way investors buy, sell, and hold stocks. A purchase price, previous high, IPO price, or analyst target can become a reference point that shapes your thinking long after the circumstances have changed.

The easiest way to reduce its impact is to step away from the old number and reassess the investment based on current information. Ask whether the company's fundamentals still support your decision, whether its valuation makes sense, and whether you would make the same investment today.

FAQs

The anchoring effect is a behavioural bias where investors fixate on an initial reference point such as a stock purchase price and fail to adjust their decisions adequately when new information arrives. 

Holding onto a declining stock because you refuse to sell below your original purchase price of ₹500 is a classic instance of anchoring. 

Historical prices and valuations provide context, but anchoring becomes destructive when an arbitrary past number overrides current fundamental analysis. 

It typically leads to holding losing positions for too long, falling into value traps by assuming lower prices mean bargains, and missing out on superior market opportunities. 

By evaluating assets strictly on current forward-looking fundamentals, conducting clean-slate assessments, and ignoring historical acquisition costs when making allocation choices. 

The purchase price acts as a psychological bookmark for personal loss or gain, triggering loss aversion that clouds objective risk assessment. 

Yes. Even professional fund managers face behavioural biases, though institutional risk controls, quantitative models, and investment committees help mitigate individual blind spots. 

Open Free Demat Account!

Join our 3.8 Cr+ happy customers

+91

Open Free Demat Account!

Join our 3.8 Cr+ happy customers
+91