
The Bombay High Court (HC) on Monday delivered a judgment setting aside an interim order that had stayed proceedings to classify Anil Ambani and Reliance Communications Ltd's bank accounts as fraud, as per PTI report.
A division bench quashed the December 2025 single bench order, describing it as illegal and perverse.
A division bench of Chief Justice Shree Chandrashekhar and Justice Gautam Ankhad allowed appeals filed by 3 public sector banks: Indian Overseas Bank, IDBI Bank and Bank of Baroda and auditor firm BDO India LLP against the December 2025 interim order.
The single bench order had granted interim relief to Ambani and his company, staying all present and future action by the banks. The division bench, while quashing the single bench order, termed it illegal and perverse. Ambani's counsels sought the high court to stay its order so that they could approach the Supreme Court, but the request was declined.
The December 2025 single bench order had granted interim relief to Ambani and Reliance Communications, citing violations of mandatory RBI rules. The order had described the case as a classic instance of banks waking up from deep slumber after years.
The interim relief stayed proceedings initiated by the banks to classify the accounts as fraud, based on a forensic audit report.
Read More: Anil Ambani Pledges Not to Leave India Without Court Permission Amid RCOM Fraud Probe!
The 3 public sector banks challenged the single bench order in January 2026. In their appeal, they contended that the forensic audit leading to the accounts being classified as fraud was legally valid and based on serious findings of fund siphoning and misutilisation.
The banks argued that this was recorded in the report submitted by the audit firm BDO LLP. They sought the division bench to quash the single bench's interim order, claiming it was perverse.
Ambani had challenged before the single bench the show-cause notices issued by Indian Overseas Bank, IDBI Bank and Bank of Baroda seeking to declare his and Reliance Communications' accounts as fraud accounts.
As interim relief, he sought a stay of the notices and an injunction against any coercive action on the ground that BDO LLP was not qualified to conduct the forensic audit, as its signatory was not a chartered accountant.
Ambani claimed BDO LLP was an accounting consultant firm and not an audit firm. The single bench had initially agreed with this contention and stayed the banks' action.
The Bombay High Court division bench has quashed the December 2025 interim order that stayed fraud proceedings against Anil Ambani and Reliance Communications. The court allowed appeals filed by 3 public sector banks and auditor BDO India LLP, setting aside the single bench order that had granted relief on grounds related to the forensic auditor's qualifications. The division bench declined to stay its order, allowing the banks to proceed with the matter.
Disclaimer: This blog has been written exclusively for educational purposes. The securities or companies mentioned are only examples and not recommendations. This does not constitute a personal recommendation or investment advice. It does not aim to influence any individual or entity to make investment decisions. Recipients should conduct their own research and assessments to form an independent opinion about investment decisions.
Investments in the securities market are subject to market risks, read all the related documents carefully before investing.
Published on: Feb 23, 2026, 2:20 PM IST

Team Angel One
We're Live on WhatsApp! Join our channel for market insights & updates
