SASCI Fund Utilisation Turns Uneven Across States as Allocations Rise: SBI

Written by: Team Angel OneUpdated on: 23 Apr 2026, 6:57 pm IST
Gaps in state-wise SASCI fund use widen as utilisation falls unevenly despite higher capital spending, according to SBI.
SASCI Fund
ShareShare on 1Share on 2Share on 3Share on 4Share on 5

The Scheme for Special Assistance to States for Capital Investment (SASCI), introduced in October 2020, has seen changes in how funds are used across states.  

A report by State Bank of India (SBI) shows that utilisation, which was largely uniform in the early phase, has become uneven as allocations increased. The programme was rolled out to support state capital spending during the pandemic through 50-year interest-free loans. 

Around ₹4.5 trillion has been disbursed over 5 years. This has coincided with a rise in states’ capital expenditure from 2.2% of GDP in FY22 to 2.7% in FY25. 

Drop in Full Utilisation Levels 

Data shows a decline in the number of states fully utilising funds. In FY21, 17 out of 28 states recorded 100% utilisation. By FY25, no state reached that level. 

Among states, West Bengal reported utilisation of 96.7%, followed by Maharashtra at 95% and Chhattisgarh at 94.4%. Lower utilisation was seen in Manipur at 47.4% and Nagaland at 51.7%. 

Fiscal Position and Variation 

States with higher debt levels and revenue deficits have generally reported lower utilisation. In such cases, a larger share of spending goes towards revenue expenditure, limiting capital outlay. Punjab, Kerala, and Telangana have shown weaker absorption in recent years. 

In comparison, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Maharashtra, and Andhra Pradesh have maintained relatively higher utilisation. Differences are also visible across demographics, with ageing states averaging 74.5% utilisation, compared with 80.6% for intermediate and 82.9% for younger states. 

Role of Fund Structure 

The design of the scheme has influenced outcomes. For every ₹1 increase in SASCI funds, total capital expenditure rises by ₹0.67, while states’ own capital spending declines by about ₹0.34. 

Tied funds, linked to sectors such as urban planning and agriculture, show a stronger link to capital expenditure. A ₹1 increase in tied funds corresponds to a ₹0.87 rise in total spending, compared with ₹0.26 for untied funds. 

Allocation for FY27 

The scheme has been extended for 2026-27 with an outlay of ₹2 trillion. Of this, ₹750 billion has been set aside as untied support, with the rest linked to reforms and infrastructure sectors. 

Read MoreIndia’s Textile Exports Rise 2.1% in FY26 on Steady Global Demand! 

Conclusion 

While SASCI has supported higher capital spending, utilisation varies across states, showing differences in fiscal position and execution capacity. 

Disclaimer: This blog has been written exclusively for educational purposes. The securities mentioned are only examples and not recommendations. This does not constitute a personal recommendation/investment advice. It does not aim to influence any individual or entity to make investment decisions. Recipients should conduct their own research and assessments to form an independent opinion about investment decisions.   
 
Investments in the securities market are subject to market risks, read all the related documents carefully before investing. 

Published on: Apr 23, 2026, 1:26 PM IST

Team Angel One

Team Angel One is a group of experienced financial writers that deliver insightful articles on the stock market, IPO, economy, personal finance, commodities and related categories.

Know More

We're Live on WhatsApp! Join our channel for market insights & updates

Open Free Demat Account!

Join our 3.5 Cr+ happy customers

+91
Enjoy Zero Brokerage on Equity Delivery
4.4 Cr+DOWNLOADS
Enjoy ₹0 Account Opening Charges

Get the link to download the App

Get it on Google PlayDownload on the App Store
Open Free Demat Account!
Join our 3.5 Cr+ happy customers