CALCULATE YOUR SIP RETURNS

Supreme Court Maintains Status Quo on Patanjali Foods Land Allotment in Telangana

Written by: Team Angel OneUpdated on: 10 Feb 2026, 4:07 pm IST
Supreme Court issues notice, keeps status quo on cancellation of Patanjali Foods' Suryapet land allotment under NMEO OP scheme.
Supreme Court Maintains Status Quo on Patanjali Foods Land Allotment in Telangana
ShareShare on 1Share on 2Share on 3Share on 4Share on 5

On February 9, 2026, the Supreme Court issued a notice on Patanjali Foods' plea against the High Court division bench refusal to stay a single judge order that upheld the cancellation of its factory zone in Suryapet district, as per LivLaw report. 

Supreme Court Issues Notice and Orders Status Quo 

A bench of Justice JB Padriwala and Justice KV Vishwanathan returned the notice within four weeks and directed both parties to maintain status quo pending further hearing. The order follows the division bench decision that declined an interim stay of the single judge judgment. 

Background of Land Allotment under NMEO OP Scheme 

Under the National Mission of Edible Oils Oil Palm scheme the Telangana government allotted Patanjali Foods 7,738 hectares in Nalgonda and 11,300 hectares in Suryapet on December 16, 2020. Four additional mandals were added on June 10, 2021.  

The company signed an affidavit on June 28, 2021, agreeing to cultivate 1,22,595 acres within five years as per the Memorandum of Agreement dated March 15, 2017. 

Read More: Supreme Court Warns WhatsApp and Meta on User Data Privacy! 

Show Cause Notices and Cancellation 

The state issued show cause notices on December 12, 2022; December 19, 2023; and October 5, 2024, alleging failure to procure seed sprouts and to establish the processing mill in the Suryapet zone.  

After a personal hearing on December 30, 2024, the government issued a cancellation order on March 15, 2025, and re‑allotted the land to another entity. 

Court Findings on Contractual Nature 

The single judge held that the matter was contractual and that Patanjali Foods had not demonstrated arbitrariness or mala fide intent.  

The court noted that while targets were met in Nalgonda, the Suryapet performance fell short, allowing the state to assess continuation of the allotment. The judge also rejected the argument that time was not of the essence, citing multiple show cause notices and a government review meeting that set clear timelines. 

Current Status and Next Steps 

With the Supreme Court maintaining status quo, the cancellation remains in effect while the appeal proceeds. The case is listed as SLP(C) No. 5434/2026, titled Patanjali Foods Limited v. Department of Horticulture. 

Conclusion 

The Supreme Court has kept the existing order on the Suryapet land cancellation, emphasizing the contractual framework and the state's discretion to evaluate performance under the NMEO OP scheme. 

Disclaimer: This blog has been written exclusively for educational purposes. The securities or companies mentioned are only examples and not recommendations. This does not constitute a personal recommendation or investment advice. It does not aim to influence any individual or entity to make investment decisions. Recipients should conduct their own research and assessments to form an independent opinion about investment decisions. 

Investments in the securities market are subject to market risks, read all the related documents carefully before investing. 

Published on: Feb 10, 2026, 10:37 AM IST

Team Angel One

Team Angel One is a group of experienced financial writers that deliver insightful articles on the stock market, IPO, economy, personal finance, commodities and related categories.

Know More

We're Live on WhatsApp! Join our channel for market insights & updates

Open Free Demat Account!

Join our 3.5 Cr+ happy customers

+91
Enjoy Zero Brokerage on Equity Delivery
4.4 Cr+DOWNLOADS
Enjoy ₹0 Account Opening Charges

Get the link to download the App

Get it on Google PlayDownload on the App Store
Open Free Demat Account!
Join our 3.5 Cr+ happy customers