SEBI Chief Flags Disclosure Gaps in IPO Documents, Seeks Greater Transparency

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has called for more robust and transparent disclosures from companies preparing for public issues. Speaking at the 14th annual convention of the Association of Investment Bankers in India, SEBI chief Tuhin Kanta Pandey highlighted recurring gaps in offer documents, which he said impede timely regulatory clearance.

He noted that insufficient details on risks, valuations, and the utilisation of funds continue to slow down the IPO vetting process. These shortcomings also reduce transparency and weaken investor understanding, according to the regulator.

SEBI’s Call for Stronger IPO Disclosures

Pandey emphasised that IPO-bound companies must improve the quality and depth of information disclosed in their draft papers. He stated that SEBI frequently encounters gaps in essential sections such as risk factors, valuation rationale, objects of the issue, and intended use of proceeds.

These gaps often trigger repeated regulatory queries, lengthening the overall approval timeline. He underlined that enhanced clarity in these areas is critical for maintaining investor confidence and ensuring efficient capital‑raising.

Need For Clearer Business Models

Beyond financial disclosures, SEBI expects greater clarity around business models presented in IPO documents. Pandey urged companies to articulate transparent revenue and cost drivers rather than relying solely on descriptive narratives.

He said the management discussion and analysis section should provide a meaningful explanation of internal and external performance drivers. This would help investors better assess sustainability, growth potential, and underlying risks.

NSE Settlement and Regulatory Progress

Pandey also addressed the long‑pending case involving the National Stock Exchange (NSE) related to unfair market access in the early 2010s. He confirmed that SEBI had accepted NSE’s settlement plea in the matter involving preferential access to select brokers on a derivatives trading server.

The issue came to light following revelations by a Singapore‑based whistle‑blower, prompting detailed regulatory investigations. The settlement represents a significant milestone in resolving a case that has hindered NSE’s efforts to pursue a public listing.

Implications For Market Participants

The SEBI chief’s remarks reflect the regulator’s focus on improving issuer transparency and reducing information asymmetry in capital markets. Issuers may experience shorter regulatory timelines if they strengthen disclosures at the drafting stage.

Investors can expect clearer offer documents that provide comprehensive insights into risks, financial drivers, and deployment of funds. The NSE settlement also signals regulatory willingness to close long‑pending cases that impact market institutions.

Read More: SEBI Approves 6 Companies for IPO, Including Kissht.

Conclusion

SEBI’s message underscores the central role of robust disclosures in safeguarding market integrity and ensuring fair investor access. The regulator has identified specific shortcomings that issuers must address to avoid delays and improve the quality of IPO documents.

In parallel, the latest development in the NSE case marks progress toward resolving legacy issues that have constrained the exchange’s listing ambitions. Together, these developments highlight SEBI’s ongoing efforts to strengthen transparency and accountability in India’s capital markets.

Disclaimer: This blog has been written exclusively for educational purposes. The securities mentioned are only examples and not recommendations. This does not constitute a personal recommendation/investment advice. It does not aim to influence any individual or entity to make investment decisions. Recipients should conduct their own research and assessments to form an independent opinion about investment decisions.

Investments in the securities market are subject to market risks, read all the related documents carefully before investing.